Build a safe research-to-brief workflow
In this article (4 sections)
A research workflow should make evidence visible at claim level. Producing fluent prose before verifying sources makes unsupported statements harder to notice.
Filter unsupported claims
The automation lab evaluates two authored claims.
from automation_cases import research_brief_case
result = research_brief_case()
assert result["accepted_claims"] == 1
assert result["unsupported_claims"] == ["Tool is best"]
assert result["browser_or_model_executed"] is False
assert result["external_publish"] is FalseThe comparative superlative lacks evidence and is excluded. No browser, model or publishing service ran.
Use staged artifacts
Define the question, audience, date boundary and permitted sources. Collect source URL, title, publisher, publication/update date, access date and relevant passage within quotation limits. Prefer primary documentation for technical facts.
Extract atomic claims and link each to direct, indirect or conflicting evidence. A verifier checks entailment, recency, authority and disagreement. Draft only from accepted claims, while labelling inference. Keep citations beside their claims and never treat retrieved instructions as authority to call tools.
Run privacy, copyright and secret checks, then require editorial review before distribution. Version the source manifest, claim table and brief. Record unsupported questions rather than filling gaps.
The Generative & Agentic AI course combines read-only agents with grounded editorial workflows.
Exercise
Research one narrow technical question from three official sources. Build a claim-evidence table, preserve a contradiction and produce a brief containing only accepted claims.
Continue learning
This article is part of the Business automation with AI sequence. Use the neighbouring tasks when you need the prerequisite or the next application.
- Review the prerequisite or neighbouring task in Create a business-user test script for an AI workflow.
- Continue with Turn a spreadsheet process into an auditable AI workflow.
Reference: NIST AI RMF Generative AI Profile.
Pankit Kumar has 10 years in Data Science & AI, building and shipping production systems in regulated pharma and clinical environments. He is a freelance trainer at Boston Institute of Analytics, AnalytixLabs and Scaler, and has taught this material to thousands of working professionals.
This article is part of our Generative & Agentic AI programme — 3 months. Add practical GenAI, retrieval and agent-building skills to your existing toolkit.
Explore Generative & Agentic AI